E57: Understanding Omicron, tech stocks plummet, VC's great resignation, Jack Dorsey's departure

Sat, 04 Dec 2021 04:42:38 +0000

Back to episodes
David Friedberg Right 00:17:19 health

The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 will spread globally and become widespread in many regions in a short period of time (on the order of weeks to a few months from early December 2021).

“one thing that seems pretty certain this variant is going to be everywhere fast, like it is so transmissible” View on YouTube
Explanation

Omicron spread globally and became the dominant variant worldwide within a few weeks of this recording.

David Friedberg Right 00:17:19 healthscience

Subsequent epidemiological analysis of Omicron’s basic reproduction number (R0) will show it to be substantially higher than prior major variants, likely in the high single digits to low double digits (roughly 7–20), and significantly higher than Delta’s R0.

“by some estimates... the r naught on this could be as high as 40... It's more likely that the R naught is somewhere between 7 and 20” View on YouTube
Explanation

Subsequent epidemiological studies estimated Omicron's effective reproduction advantage and R0-like transmissibility broadly within the predicted high range, well above Delta's.

David Friedberg Right 00:17:31 healthscience

By roughly two weeks after this recording (mid-December 2021), data from South Africa and other early-affected regions will make it clear whether Omicron materially increases COVID-19 hospitalization rates compared to prior variants.

“we'll know in the next two weeks of whether this actually changes hospitalizations” View on YouTube
Explanation

By mid-December 2021, early data from South Africa and other regions showed Omicron was associated with proportionally lower hospitalization rates than prior variants.

Chamath Palihapitiya Right 00:17:51 health

The Omicron variant will not prove to be significantly more dangerous than prior variants in terms of disease severity or health-system impact; it will not materially worsen the COVID-19 crisis relative to the Delta wave.

“I think this whole thing is a complete fucking nothing burger” View on YouTube
Explanation

Omicron proved less severe per infection than Delta, even though it caused a massive surge in case counts.

David Sacks Right 00:19:54 healthpolitics

In the United States, following the emergence of Omicron, there will not be a return to broad COVID-19 stay-at-home lockdowns or widespread K–12 school closures at the state level, even if Omicron spreads widely.

“we're not going back to lockdowns. No matter what happens with this Omicron thing. We're not going to do school closures” View on YouTube
Explanation

The US broadly did not return to widespread lockdowns or K-12 school closures following the Omicron wave.

David Sacks Partly Right 00:21:29 health

Subsequent retrospective analysis and public discourse following the Omicron wave will increasingly conclude that broad COVID-19 lockdowns were largely ineffective at stopping the virus, primarily delaying rather than preventing spread.

“what that does is admit, and I think what Omicron will show is that lockdowns didn't work at all” View on YouTube
Explanation

Whether lockdowns were effective remains a genuinely contested question among researchers and in public discourse, without a clear retrospective consensus that they 'didn't work at all'.

David Friedberg Right 00:24:02 healthscience

SARS-CoV-2 will continue to evolve with new notable variants emerging roughly annually, and COVID-19 will become an endemic, seasonal disease similar to influenza rather than being eradicated.

“There will be a variant every year. It'll it'll be a it'll be a seasonal disease. And it'll, it'll, it'll be something like the flu” View on YouTube
Explanation

SARS-CoV-2 has continued producing new variants roughly annually and COVID-19 became an endemic, seasonal illness similar to influenza.

Chamath Palihapitiya Right 00:24:15 health

Omicron specifically will not be the variant that causes a major new step-change in COVID-19 severity or societal disruption beyond what has already been experienced with earlier variants.

“There may be a variant that matters, but this is not it” View on YouTube
Explanation

Omicron did not cause a qualitative step-change in societal disruption beyond what had already occurred with Delta.

Chamath Palihapitiya Right 00:37:25 economy

The elevated inflation that began in 2021 in the United States will prove persistent, remaining significantly above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for several years and contributing to a multi-year period of economic difficulty ("a few years of pain").

“Inflation is now here. I think it's here to last. I've been pretty consistent about this, and this is the real reason why we're going to have a few years of pain” View on YouTube
Explanation

US inflation remained well above the Fed's 2% target for several years following this prediction, causing significant economic strain through 2022-2023.

David Friedberg Right 00:39:47 economy

Global supply chain disruptions and associated pricing distortions (e.g., elevated freight rates, input shortages) will largely normalize by the end of 2022, with their effects mostly worked through to end consumers by then.

“a lot of folks estimate that this will take all the way through 2022 for that supply chain kind of glut and mismatch to work its way all the way through to the consumer” View on YouTube
Explanation

Global supply chain disruptions and freight/pricing distortions largely normalized by the end of 2022.

Chamath Palihapitiya Right 00:44:44 economy

Beginning in 2021 and for the foreseeable future (multi‑year period), the U.S. will experience persistent, structurally higher inflation levels (i.e., not merely a short, transitory spike), with a sustained upward trend in prices driven by underinvestment and distorted work incentives.

“You put these two things together. Structural inflation is here. We've underinvested underinvested at the macro level, and we've completely distorted people's incentives to work at the micro level. Prices go up.” View on YouTube
Explanation

The US experienced persistent, structurally elevated inflation through 2022-2023 rather than a brief transitory spike.

David Sacks Too Early 00:45:47 economymarkets

From roughly 2022–2031, U.S. inflation will persist beyond what policymakers had called 'transitory', leading to rising interest rates and a decade in which public-market growth stocks, on average, perform worse than they did in the decade from ~2011–2020.

“Now it looks like we're moving into an environment in which inflation is certainly not transitory. We don't know how long it's going to last for. And that creates an expectation of interest rates are going to rise. And so the next decade may not be as good for growth stocks.” View on YouTube
Explanation

This is a full decade-horizon comparison (2022-2031) that has not yet fully elapsed; growth-stock performance from 2023-2025 was in fact very strong, complicating a clean underperformance verdict this early.

David Friedberg Right 00:48:20 ventureclimate

Over the ensuing years after 2021, there will be a pronounced 'second act' trend in which many VCs who had major financial success in the 2010s shift their focus to climate-tech investing, driving a surge of capital into climate-tech startups, including a substantial subset of companies and technologies that are not economically viable and whose businesses or technologies ultimately fail commercially.

“What I am seeing is a shift of people who have had successful investing, um, track records and have had massive outcomes shifting their attention. Now they take some time off. And I'd say almost 100% of them come back... And then they're like, I want to work on climate change solutions... So one of the things I'm seeing, um, is this kind of second act phenomenon where VCs are moving away from being pure play technologists and making money to saying, I want to do stuff that's a little bit more meaningful and altruistic coming into climate change. And as a result, we're seeing insane, um, funding happening in climate change, tech companies or climate tech... stuff that, in my opinion, doesn't make any sense. Businesses that aren't real businesses, technologies that don't actually make sense. It'll never work out.” View on YouTube
Explanation

A significant wave of VCs did shift attention toward climate-tech investing after 2021, with a notable number of unviable companies and technologies subsequently failing commercially.

David Sacks Right 00:53:22 marketseconomy

Within the next few years after late 2021, public-market and late-stage private growth stocks will enter a bear or down cycle characterized by materially lower valuation multiples, causing significant mark-downs and negative shocks ('rude awakening') for younger founders and investors who have not previously experienced such a downturn.

“Keith and I just talked about how we're about to enter a very different kind of macro environment for growth stocks, and we don't know how long it's going to take, but there's no question that multiples and valuations are going to come down. And there's a lot of younger founders and investors who never lived through a bear market or a down cycle. And they're about to get a rude awakening.” View on YouTube
Explanation

2022 saw a severe bear market for growth stocks with dramatic valuation-multiple compression, catching many newer investors off guard.

David Sacks Wrong 01:09:33 techpolitics

After Jack Dorsey’s resignation in late 2021, Twitter’s content-moderation and censorship practices will become more restrictive over the following years (e.g., more content and accounts limited or removed for speech reasons than under Dorsey’s tenure).

“I agree, I agree things are only going to get worse once he's gone.” View on YouTube
Explanation

Twitter's content moderation actually became notably less restrictive after Elon Musk's 2022 acquisition, contrary to the prediction of increased restrictiveness after Dorsey's departure.

David Friedberg Too Early 01:14:32 techmarkets

If Twitter implements and enforces a policy restricting user-generated videos/images of people in public without their consent, then in the subsequent years TikTok (which will not adopt comparably restrictive rules on such public footage) will gain a substantial share of the market for user-generated video content showing events like riots and crime, becoming the primary destination for that type of content.

“Don't you think the biggest winner the biggest winner here is gonna be TikTok. Because if Twitter does go forward with this thing. Yeah. If they say, look, you can't put user generated content on our platform if it has, um, video and images of personal, uh, of people without their consent and approval, it's gonna eliminate all of this democratization of access to video feeds of riots and crime and all sorts of things that have been a real, a real big boon. So, like, TikTok's not gonna do that. TikTok's gonna end up soaking up this whole market, right, for user generated content.” View on YouTube
Explanation

Twitter never adopted the specific restrictive user-generated-content policy described, so the conditional scenario predicting a TikTok market-share gain from it was never directly tested.